I have been battling with all of the factors which come into play when making an espresso and thought it was about time that I try and put together a formula and open it up for comments.
All of the factors in the forumla effect the extraction time & flavour of the coffee and it is only by balancing all of these factors that you will get the best out of the coffee. Some of the factors should remain relatively constant controlled by the barista, whilst others are environment based and are subject to almost constant change, the final extraction should however always be around 25 seconds.
The Good Espresso Formula
Grind Coursness +
Dosing quantity +
Levelling +
Tamping Pressure +
Brew Pressure +
Brew Temperature +
Fluid Quantity +
= 25 Second extraction plus of minus a few seconds
Grind Coursness - The finer the grind the slower the extraction, grind coursness can also effect flavour extraction so it may be better do go with a courser grind whilst increasing the size of the dose to keep the extraction time within limits
Dosing quantity - This is the amount of coffee ground into the basket. A triple basket takes 21 grams, a double takes 14 and a single obviously takes 7 grams. Most machines ship with single and double baskets
Levelling - There are many different methods of levelling the coffee in the basket, all of them try to attain the same thing. A consistent level of coffee in the basket so as to ensure there are no weak spots in the puck for the water to surge through when pullin your shot. It is not important which process you use as long as it works and remains as consistant as possible.
Tamping Pressure - Again, there are a few different methods of tamping, all trying to achieve the same goal. Equal pressure applied across the puck to ensure and even extraction. The "Ideal" pressure is said to be 30lbs or 14kg but, in my opinion, consistency of pressure is more important than the actual tamping pressure achieved, again this is to reduce the number of variables for which you have to account when adjusting your shots.
Brew Pressure - Machines have an OPV valve which is usually sometimes adjustable (usually the more expensive machines). Ideal extraction pressure is said to be 8-10Bar and most machines have their OPV valves set for this by default. Adjustable OPV valves on top end machines is an area which seems likely to release more promise in the future but at the moment remains pretty much a constant.
Brew Temperature - A stable grew temperature will ensure a consistent flavour extraction, unfortunately on smaller machines this is usually more difficult and temperature surfing if often required to get consistent temperatures. The recent advent of PID's in high end coffee machines has done a lot to ensure more temperature stability. By remaining constant in your brew process you can ensure some level of temperature consistency even if it is not perfect.
Fluid Quantity - A double espresso is 60ml of liquid whilst a single is 30ml. Extraction time for an espresso remains the same irrespective of whether a single, double or triple basket is used. I would recommend throwing away your single baskets as they are very difficult to produce good shots from and not really of any practical value. Triple baskets are not actually used for pulling triple shots but rather as a means to be able to use a courser grind whilst keeping the 25sec extraction time (courser grind balances out more coffee)
All of these factors together should equal a +-25 second extraction of +-60ml of coffee.
Enviromental factors, such as humidity, also effect the extraction time of the coffee and need to be adjusted for on an ongoing basis.
As I am sure you can now understand, you are aiming for a moving target. Don;t loose hope though, by minimising the variables and practicing, you will be frequented by those "god shots" on a more regular basis which makes it all worthwhile!
JohnB
Please let me know if you think I left anything out or want to discuss my formula more on our forum {mos_fb_discuss:9}
| An awesome article from CoffeeGeek.com by James Hoffman, 2007 World Barista Champ. This article was brought to our attention by Cuth Bland, Thanks Cuth!! |
For my opening article I wanted to discuss a subject relevant to anyone who enjoys espresso, and maybe debunk a few myths in the process. I’ve only been a barista for about three years, starting off in the industry retailing domestic machines in a department store and somehow ending up head of training for a machine manufacturer in the UK.
Coffeegeeks are known to be strange bunch. They like to take their coffee skills to new levels by constantly pushing themselves to learn as much about coffee and the art of making coffee as they can. That quest for that ultimate “God Shot”, or producing the most glorious latte art that would make any coffee lover openly state: “That’s the most beautiful thing I have ever seen since viewing the world from the top of Mount Everest – You can just hear the non-coffeegeeks thinking: “Get a life”. As a home barista who is on his quest to make that ultimate coffee drink (being espresso or latte with the ultimate latte art) that would satisfy him to such an extent as to proclaim that he’d made the greatest coffee drink that has ever graced this planet, I’m sure I can speak for many other home baristas who have asked the question to themselves: “I wonder what it would be like to have a coffee shop.”
{mos_fb_discuss:9}
Well a fellow Barista Undergounder in the form of Louis (the latte art king) and myself (TrevO, the latte art jester), spoke about it at Joe’s place (Ikhofi). After the discussion, Joe presented us with a challenge. “Could home baristas actually run a real coffee shop.” He said that he decided not to open on Sundays, as his business was more active on weekdays and Saturday mornings. So he offered a challenge to us to run his shop on Sundays for a few months, saying, it will either work itself more into our systems, or it could work itself out of our systems. But there was a catch. We’d have to do everything. Joe would only observe, probably to make sure we didn’t burn the place down by accident. Now how could we say no to that. We would call the Sundays at Ikhofi “The Art of Coffee” with no breakfasts (none of us wanted to fry bacon and eggs) and only cakes or muffins (anything that compliments coffee). And it was only in the mornings from 9am - 1pm.
Arstechnica ArticleBy Yun Xie | Published: November 25, 2008 - 01:36PM CT Used coffee grounds may be garbage to most of us but, to chemical engineers at University of Nevada, they are a versatile source of green energy. Narasimharao Kondamudi, Susanta Mohapatra, and Mano Misra proposed that the solid waste from coffee brewing can do a lot more than act as compost for gardens. They set out to see if they could extract oils from old coffee grounds and chemically convert those oils to biodiesel.
A great article by Jerry Baldwin, one of the founders of Starbucks: Many of the more macho coffee drinkers think that all decaffeinated coffee is beside the point. “Why bother?” they ask. But those who value the taste of coffee as well as the stimulation may disagree. Then, there are those people who, despite their love and appreciation of coffee, can’t tolerate much caffeine; others, who tolerate it well in the early part of the day, can’t sleep if they drink coffee later in the day. Caffeine metabolism varies widely among individuals. Generally, men process caffeine faster than women, especially pregnant women, who are slowest. The liver metabolizes caffeine, so age and liver health also affect one’s tolerance. (See “Caffeine and Decaf” in the curator’s Joy of Coffee, or the Wikipedia entry on caffeine.) All this brings us to decaffeinated coffee.
As recently as the mid-’80s, people were drinking more decaf, thinking that caffeine was bad for them. As more and more research showed the health benefits of coffee, people began to switch back to caffeine. Sales of decaf in the late ’80s for some roasters were as high as 25 percent of total coffee sales. Today, among both commercial and specialty roasters, the percentage is more like 10 to 15: lower, but still a significant portion of coffee drinking. Please suspend any chemo-phobia you may have while reading this. Don’t let the technical words for chemicals put you off, and don’t play into the hands of the irresponsible scare tactics of unscrupulous advertisers of Swiss Water-process decaffeination. There are four main methods of decaffeination in wide use today, each named for the solvent used: di-hydro-oxide (aka water), ethyl acetate, supercritical CO2, and methylene chloride (dichloromethane in Europe). Even if you remember your high school chemistry, the words may be unfamiliar, but keep that chemo-phobia in check. (A new method using ultraviolet light is coming to the market. Don’t get your hopes up–poor flavor, so far.) All methods produce a range of quality primarily due to bean selection (garbage in = garbage out) and process temperature, which affects the speed and thus the cost of processing. The American standard for decaffeinated coffee is to remove 97 percent of the original caffeine. Since caffeine content of individual coffees varies widely (see my earlier post on the topic), the amount of residual caffeine will also vary. Unfortunately, all decaffeination methods adversely affect flavor, but careful selection of green beans along with competent roasting and brewing can produce a cup that may fool the experts. For decades, we have preferred coffees decaffeinated with methylene chloride (MC) because time after time, year after year, they have produced the most flavorful cup. The method is simple enough. First, steam swells the beans to make it easier for the caffeine to be removed. The solvent is then circulated through the beans and then into distillation to remove the caffeine and wax that have been removed from the beans. The cleansed solvent is recirculated and re-distilled until the caffeine has been removed. The beans are then rinsed with water and vacuum-dried. The most sensitive test for detecting residual MC detects as little as one part per million. I have never seen a test result that detects any amount in specialty decaf. Furthermore, the boiling point of the solvent is 104 degrees F and coffee is roasted at 375 to 425 degrees F. Any remaining solvent, if there were any, would be vaporized during roasting. MC has been eliminated from cosmetics and has stringent worker safety regulations in Europe, but the procedures used in coffee processing and roasting leave nothing to cause any concern. Most important, after safety, is taste. MC is the most selective solvent, leaving the greatest coffee flavor in the beans. We have also cupped many samples that have been decaffeinated using either ethyl acetate or carbon dioxide (CO2). Neither method has consistently produced satisfying flavor in the cup. Ethyl acetate, a synthetic fruit ester, leaves a fruity aftertaste in the coffee–unfortunately nothing like the berry and citrus flavors we find in East African coffees. And we had high hopes for the CO2 process in the early ’90s. Carbon dioxide is the carbonation in sparkling water, but it is forced into the coffee at pressures well in excess of 1000 pounds per square inch to extract the caffeine. Perhaps it’s the pressure that also forces out the coffee flavor. The last method to discuss is dihydro-oxide–water. At one time, water process was the most damaging to coffee flavor. That general statement is no longer true, due to improvements in the processing by some companies. Although some water-process decaf has flavor approaching methylene chloride (and a relatively new North American company is making great strides in cup quality), further development will be required before it can be methylene chloride’s equal. In general the process uses water as the solvent, supersaturated with soluble solids from green coffee beans, except caffeine. The idea is that when the warm solvent is circulated through the coffee, it will extract only caffeine, which in turn is removed from the circulating fluid with activated carbon. It’s a thesis that in practice has not produced great cups of decaf. The old standby water decaffeination company, Swiss Water (the only attempt to brand a process), of Vancouver, Canada, is doing all the advertising while others are improving their process. We prefer the cup quality of other companies, and I deplore the marketing tactics of Swiss Water. In the late ’80s, when I first wrote to the previous owners, I decried their deliberately misleading advertising. Here they go again. They are falling back into advertising tactics that assume the ignorance of the audience. Their attempt to associate the chemical names of the other processes with some chemo-hysteria is unethical. To summarize, of the four major processes for decaf, only methylene chloride and water are widely used in specialty coffee (here, by the way, Wikipedia on decaffeination is less strong than it is on caffeine). Methylene chloride can produce the best cup results when good coffee and careful processing are used. Good coffee and careful processing also produce the best results from dihydro-oxide, but the best is still second in cup quality to MC. Source: http://food.theatlantic.com/coffee-culture/in-defense-of-decaff-1.php |